www.brainleague.com
 
ISSUE : SEPTEMBER 2006
 
   
CASE STUDY
 
Kecofa v. L’Oreal

Case Facts

The case involved a ‘Copyright’ war between the 17.2 billion dollar French cosmetic giant, L’Oreal and Kecofa, a 12.3 million dollar Dutch cosmetician. L’Oreal manufactures and sells an exclusive and expensive perfume called Treasure (Tresor), an allegedly cheap imitation of which Kecofa offers to its customers under the name of ‘Female Treasure’ and at one-tenth the price of Treasure. Affected by the sales of Female Treasure, L’Oreal attempted to stop Kecofa by filing a suit for trademark infringement, alleging that the name 'Female Treasure' was likely to cause confusion about the 'Treasure' brand, but failed. L’Oreal then filed a copyright infringement suit against Kecofa, alleging Kecofa to be imitating its fragrance of Treasure.

Issues

  1. Whether smell can be the subject of copyright?

  2. Whether Kecofa infringed on L’Oreal’s copyright over Treasure, by making and selling a similar smelling Female Treasure?

Analysis

Under the Dutch Copyright law, anything that is perceptible and original can be the subject matter of copyright. The Court observed that as long as the smell of a perfume is original and perceptible (even if perceptible only through the nose), it can be copyrighted. It said that a perfume may be copyrighted when it smells different from a pre-existing one, even if the ingredients used in making it are not any different.

L’Oreal argued that the perfume’s fragrance is a creative work because Treasure is an exclusive fragrance created by a unique combination of 26 ingredients and that such a combination, by itself, would make it a work of art. The fragrance itself need not be new. As long as the maker puts his own creativity into making the fragrance, he is entitled to copyright it. The court agreed and said that L’Oreal's Treasure is copyrightable as a work of art.

L’Oreal submitted a chemical analysis report to show that Kecofa used 24 out of Treasure’s 26 ingredients to make the imitative Female Treasure. Since imitation amounts to infringement under Copyright law, the court held that Kecofa infringed on L’Oreal's copyright on frangrance.

 

 
Copyright @ Brain League IP Services Pvt. Ltd. 2006
You can now access IP related research papers, white papers, opinion papers, case briefs and more on our website. Register for free at www.brainleague.com/researchpaper.htm
We welcome your observations and comments on contact@brainleague.com