Search 
 
 
INTELLEPEDIA
Case Studies
1 Apotex USA, Inc. v. Merck & Co., 254 F.3d 1031 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
2 Arkie Lures, Inc. v. Gene Larew Tackle, Inc., 119 F.3d 953 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
3 Bharat Law House vs. Wadhwa
4 Chou V Univ of Chi & Arch Dev Corp
5 Crater V Lucent Technologies
6 Diamond v. Diehr
7 Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 100 S.Ct. 2204, Jun 16, 1980.
8 Dunlop Holdings, Ltd. v. Ram Golf Corp., 524 F.2d 33 (7th Cir. 1975)
9 Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. 333 US 127 (1948)
10 Gramophone Company of India Ltd. – Appellants vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey and Ors. – Respondent, AIR 1984 SC 667.
11 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products, j Jackson.
12 Hallco Mfg. Co. v. Foster, 256 F.3d 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
13 Helifix Ltd. v Blok-lok Ltd.
14 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Neel Punatar, Case No. D2004-0351
15 Inamed V Lubomyr Kuzmak
16 Int'l Nutrition Co. v. Horphag Research Ltd., 257 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
17 J.E.M. AG Supply V Pioneer Hi Bred
18 Linear Tech. Corp. v. Micrel, Inc., 275 F.3d 1040 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
19 Lough v Brunswick
20 National Recovery Techs. Inc. v. Magnetic Separation Sys. Inc., 166 F.3d 1190 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
21 Pennock v. Dialogue
22 Pfaff v. Wells, 119 US 55 (1998)
23 Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. – Plaintiff v. Dua Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. - Defendant, 1988 Arb. L. R. 315 (Delhi High Court).
24 R.G. Anand - Appellants vs. Delux Films and Ors. - Respondent, AIR 1978 SC 1614
25 Rhone-Poulenc Agro v. Dekalb Genetics Corp., 284 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
26 Rosaire v. Baroid Sales
27 Rotec Indus. v. Mitsubishi gajarsa Corp., 215 F.3d 1246
28 Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225
29 Special Devices v. OEA, 269 F. 3d 1120 (2001)
30 State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Sign. Fin. Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1638, (Fed. Cir. 1998).
31 Tilghman v. Proctor, 102 US 707 (1880)
32 Topliff v. Topliff
33 TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Mktg. Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23
34 Vas-Cath, Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (Rich)
35 Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. Hilton Davis
36 Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora and another, 1999 Arb. L. R. 620 (Delhi High Court).
37 Zenith Elecs. Corp. v. Exzec, Inc., 182 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir 1999)
Opnion Papers
1 Planning the right privacy policy for you and your visitors
2 Call for a shorter Copyright Term to foster faster creation
3 Did India need Product patent regime to Innovate?
4 Should Medical Methods Be Patented?
5 New Regulatory Definitions May Change the Business You Thought You Were In
Research Papers
1 Star Wars: film Permitting, prior restraint & Govertment's
role in the entertainment industry
2 Anti-Circumvention laws to protect Digital Rights: An Indian Perspective
3 Media& Monopoly in the Information age
4 Right of Publicity and its Descendibility
5 Testing Parameters for Software Patentability
6 Patentability of scientific principles and natural relationships
7 Complications In Patenting Biotech Inventions
8 Patent protection for medical methods: Ethics Vs. Patent incentives
9 Should Distinctiveness have anything to do with Dilution
COPYRIGHT © BRAINLEAGUE, 2006 - 2009